Figures

 

FIGURE 1	OUTLINE MAP OF THE STUDY AREA SHOWING AREAS OF INTEREST AND TRANSECTS.	6
FIGURE 2	THE ACQUISITION OF AIR IMAGES	10
FIGURE 3.	IMAGE BAND TO BAND INTERLACE ERROR.	16
FIGURE 4.	FINAL MOSAIC USING BANDS 4R,3G,2B (FALSE COLOUR INFRA RED IMAGE).	17
FIGURE 5	FINAL VEGETATION CLASSIFICATION MAP.	18
FIGURE 6.	NORMAL IMAGE AND VEGETATION MAP OF AUSTIN BAY.	22
FIGURE 7.	NORMAL IMAGE AND VEGETATION MAP OF CREERY WETLANDS.	23
FIGURE 8.	NORMAL IMAGE AND VEGETATION MAP OF GOEGRUP LAKES.	24
FIGURE 9.	NORMAL IMAGE AND VEGETATION MAP OF HARVEY RIVER DELTA	25
FIGURE 10	NORMAL IMAGE AND VEGETATION MAP OF ROBERTS BAY.	26
FIGURE 11	ELECTRICAL INTERFERENCE PATTERNS	31
FIGURE E- 1.	CASUARINA AND MELALEUCA  ASSOCIATION	42
FIGURE E- 2.	HEATH ASSOCIATION	42
FIGURE E- 3.	FLOODED GUM AND CASUARINA	43
FIGURE E- 4.	SAMPHIRE ASSOCIATION	43

 

Tables

 

TABLE 1.	SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS FRINGING VEGETATION MAPPING IN THE PEEL-HARVEY	9
TABLE 2	SPECTRAL  AND OPTICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF DMSV INSTRUMENT.	11
TABLE 3	IMAGE ACQUISITION INFORMATION	12
TABLE 4	CLASSIFICATION VEGETATION CLASSES AND THEIR LOCATION	13
TABLE 5.	PRESENCE OF VEGETATION CLASSES BY SUBIMAGE	14
TABLE 6	BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED MONITORING AREAS (UTM ZONE 50 (M)).	19
TABLE 7	SURFACE AREA OF CLASSES BY SUBIMAGE (HECTARES)	20
TABLE 8	SURFACE AREA OF CLASSES BY PROPOSED MONITORING AREAS (HECTARES)	21
TABLE 9.	COMPARISON OF SATELLITE, AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY AND DMSV INSTRUMENTS	30